News Hub

Industry News: Can an RF Circulator Replace a Duplexer? Understanding When It Works — and When It Doesn't.; RF Circulator vs Isolator vs Duplexer: Choosing the Right Device for Your Design; Ku‑Band RF Circulator: Specs, Integration & Reliability

Company News: HzBeat at European Microwave Week 2025(EuMW) — Booth E086; Typical Microstrip Circulators by Hzbeat for Global Markets; SMT Microstrip Circulators & Isolators by Hzbeat: Compact RF Solutions for 5G & Satcom

Can an RF Circulator Replace a Duplexer? Understanding When It Works — and When It Doesn't.

Updated on: Oct 17, 2025

Keywords: rf circulator replace duplexer, tdd vs fdd duplexing, hybrid duplexing network design, group delay ripple evm, circulator time blanking method

No repetition, no fluff — a boundary-focused guide: TDD versus FDD, leakage math that drives RX desense, failure modes you must respect, and a lab test plan to prove it.

Short Answer (TL;DR)
Direction vs Frequency Separation — One Graphic to Rule It
TDD Success Case — How a Circulator Can Stand In
FDD Failure Case — Why a Duplexer Is Non‑negotiable
The Math of Leakage‑Driven RX Desense
Lab Validation Plan (Pass/Fail Criteria)
Hybrid Alternatives (Circulator + Filters/Switches)
Common Pitfalls & Correctives
References

Short Answer (TL;DR)

Yes, for TDD and same‑frequency links; No, for FDD and simultaneous TX/RX. A circulator provides directional isolation (~20–25 dB) and works when TX and RX do not overlap in time. A duplexer provides steep frequency separation and high TX↔RX isolation (>60 dB) and is mandatory when they do.

If you need a general selection guide (not the boundary problem), see our companion article.

Direction vs Frequency Separation — One Graphic to Rule It

Direction vs Frequency Separation

TDD Success Case — How a Circulator Can Stand In

Case: X‑band pulsed radar TR module

TX pulse width 20 µs, PRF 1 kHz; RX gate opens 15 µs after TX blanking.
Circulator isolation 22 dB; forward IL 0.6 dB; VSWR ≤ 1.25:1.
Receiver front‑end muted during TX; recovery in 5 µs, within guard time.

Result:

With timing discipline and moderate isolation, the circulator meets range‑bin requirements without a duplexer. Add a PA‑side isolator for mismatch events.

FDD Failure Case — Why a Duplexer Is Non‑negotiable

Case: Ku‑band FDD ground station (simultaneous TX/RX)

TX EIRP high; RX requires sensitivity near thermal noise floor.
Using only a circulator, TX→RX leakage elevates the RX noise floor by ~8 dB.
EVM/ACLR compliance fails; adjacent‑band emissions exceed mask.

Takeaway:

Without steep filter skirts and >60 dB isolation, a circulator cannot protect the RX chain in FDD. A cavity/ceramic duplexer is mandatory.

Simultaneous satellite

Simultaneous satellite links demand high TX↔RX isolation and strict masks. Photo © Nilfanion, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The Math of Leakage‑Driven RX Desense

Estimate required TX→RX isolation from the link budget and receiver sensitivity:

Rule of thumb

Required Isolation (dB) ≥ PTX + Gpath − (NF + SNRreq + Margin) − Psens

Where Gpath is the unintended coupling from TX chain into RX chain (through antenna/structure/cables), Psens is the receiver sensitivity, and Margin accounts for temperature, aging, and manufacturing spread.

Example thresholds

Well‑designed FDD base stations often need >60–70 dB TX↔RX isolation to keep leakage below the RX noise contribution.
TDD radar with aggressive blanking may pass with ~20–25 dB circulator isolation (plus PA‑side isolator).

For modulated links, control group delay ripple and amplitude ripple; both drive EVM beyond budget even if isolation math looks OK.

Lab Validation Plan (Pass/Fail Criteria)

Bench setup

RF source → PA → DUT path (circulator / duplexer / hybrid) → directional coupler → antenna/load; RX chain monitored via spectrum analyzer and VNA for S‑parameters; optionally a vector signal analyzer for EVM/ACLR.

Test	Target / Pass	Notes
TX→RX leakage (dB)	FDD: ≥60–70; TDD: ~20–25 + blanking	Over temperature/frequency
Group delay ripple	≤ specified (e.g., ≤2–5 ns)	Impacts EVM
EVM/ACLR	Per 3GPP/mission spec	Use realistic waveforms
VSWR / match	<1.25:1 preferred	Watch temperature drift
Hot‑switch & mismatch	No damage, stable PA	Monitor isolator load temperature

Hybrid Alternatives (Circulator + Filters/Switches)

Circulator + Band‑pass/Notch filters: Adds selectivity to directionality; effective where space permits.
Circulator + T/R switch + RX blanking: Classic TDD radar method; timing discipline is key.
PA‑side Isolator: Mandatory for mismatch/hot‑switch tolerance; design thermal path for the termination.

See: Waveguide Isolators · SMT Isolators

Common Pitfalls & Correctives

Confusing direction with selectivity: A circulator controls direction; a duplexer controls frequency.
Ignoring thermal design: The termination on isolators must survive worst‑case VSWR events.
Evaluating at room temp only: Re‑measure isolation/IL/VSWR over temp and after vibration.
Waveform mismatch: Validate with real modulations, not just CW; check EVM/ACLR.

References

R. E. Collin, Foundations for Microwave Engineering, 2nd ed., McGraw‑Hill.
IEEE MTT tutorials and classic papers on ferrite nonreciprocal devices (circulators/isolators).
MDPI Electronics/Sensors special issues on ferrite circulators and isolators (open access case studies).
NASA Technical Reports (microwave front‑ends with ferrite components), open literature.
3GPP EVM/ACLR specifications guiding RX desense and TX leakage budgets in FDD systems.

Need boundary guidance for your project?

Tell us your frequency plan (TDD/FDD), power, and masks — we’ll propose a circulator/isolator set or a hybrid path that passes the lab.

Contact Hzbeat RF Team

About the Author

HzBeat Editorial Content Team

Marketing Director, Chengdu Hertz Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (Hzbeat)
Keith has over 18 years in the RF components industry, focusing on the intersection of technology, healthcare applications, and global market trends.

NEWS